Different Types of Intermittent Fasting
Let’s start with a comprehensive breakdown of the different types of intermittent fasting that exist out there. These include:
- 16:8 Fasting: This essentially means avoiding food for 16 hours and eating within an eight-hour window.
- 5:2 Fasting: That means that you eat normally for five days and restrict calories or fast entirely for two days.
- Alternate Day Fasting: Where you simply don’t eat food every other day.
Time-Restricted Feeding: Where there is a particular window of time where one is feeding and then not eating during other times.
The Arguments for Intermittent Fasting
Why might intermittent fasting be a good idea? The overarching idea is that there are different things that your body does when you’re not eating.
One thing is that your body has lower insulin than it produces. And when you’re not making insulin, you can get more sensitized to it.
That’s a good thing because you end up requiring less of it to control your blood sugar. The knock-on effects of that have resulted in studies showing that intermittent fasting may help lower blood sugar levels, enhance insulin sensitivity, and reduce the risk of type two diabetes.
There is also some popular thinking around weight loss and fat reduction. If you are eating in a narrower window of time and limiting your total food intake, intermittent fasting may cause weight loss (particularly with abdominal fat). That said, this is a bit of a grey area.
We also may be able to use it for our metabolic health. There has been data linking intermittent fasting to improvements in blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and other markers of overall metabolic health.
That may then tie into things like cell repair and autophagy. Autophagy is kind of having its own moment, but it means that we chew up and destroy unhealthy cells — breaking down bad cells to make room for good cells, which we do more during fasting.
There are also purported benefits around inflammation. Some research suggests that intermittent fasting can lower inflammatory markers, which would be a good thing and lower the risk of chronic diseases like heart disease and many cancers.
The Arguments Against Intermittent Fasting
When it comes to the pros and cons of intermittent fasting, we’ve covered a lot of the good that it could do and the data associated with it. But what could be wrong about intermittent fasting?
The biggest thing to consider is whether these benefits are coming about because people eat in a certain time – as many would claim – or because they lowered their total food intake.
There have been studies trying to make this distinction between time and total intake. The thing they have consistently found is that lower food intake is the bigger needle mover — rather than the periods in which people eat.
Conversely, those that practice intermittent fasting but fail to lower their total food intake, do not see the same benefits as the ones listed above.
Metabolically, the argument is that if you constrain your food to a certain window of time, that by itself is helpful. The behavioral effects are that when people constrain their food to that window of time, they end up eating less food overall.